Waist-to-height ratio
WHtR
The waist circumference divided by the height, both in the same unit; Ashwell and Hsieh (2005) propose 0.5 as the boundary above which health risk rises.
WHtR≈0.4706
WHtR equals 80 divided by 170, is approximately 0.4706
Den här sidan finns på svenska. Byt till svenska
Definition — what does that mean?
The waist circumference divided by the height, both in the same unit; 0.5 is the boundary above which health risk is proposed to rise.
In Swedish: Midja–längdkvot
WHtR
The waist circumference divided by the height, both in the same unit; Ashwell and Hsieh (2005) propose 0.5 as the boundary above which health risk rises.
WHtR≈0.4706
WHtR equals 80 divided by 170, is approximately 0.4706
You are given
Round to 2 decimals.
Source: Ashwell M, Hsieh SD (2005). Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 56(5), 303–307. — checked October 19, 2026
w is the waist circumference and h the height, in the same unit; the ratio has none. The rule of thumb that goes with it, keep your waist to less than half your height, is the ratio below 0.5.
A waist of 80 cm on a height of 170 cm: WHtR = 80 / 170 = 0.47, under the boundary. A waist of 95 cm on the same height is 0.56. Turned round, half of 170 cm is 85 cm: the waist at which this person reaches 0.5.
Ashwell and Hsieh (2005) proposed 0.5 as a single boundary for men and women, adults and children, above which the risk of the conditions linked to abdominal fat rises; the source is cited under the formula. It is a screening threshold from population studies, and a person at 0.52 is not ill nor one at 0.48 well. The measure says where the fat sits, which the scales do not.
BMI divides weight by height squared and cannot tell muscle from fat or a waist from a chest. The waist-to-height ratio is a tape measure’s answer to the same question and needs no scale. The waist–hip ratio is the other tape measure, dividing by the hip instead; the body measurements calculator works out all three.
Why half the height?
Because the boundary fell near 0.5 in the studies Ashwell and Hsieh reviewed, across populations, and
a half is easy to remember.
Does it work for children?
The same 0.5 was proposed for children, which is part of the measure’s appeal; BMI needs age charts.
Is there an upper boundary?
Some guidance adds 0.6 as a second line. The formula is the same; the lines are a matter of guidance,
not of arithmetic.
| Solve for | Rearranged | With the numbers | Comes to |
|---|---|---|---|
| w | WHtRh | 0.4706·170 | 80 |
| h | wWHtR | 800.4706 | 170 |
| WHtR | wh | 80170 | 0.4706 |
Last reviewed October 20, 2026 ·How pages are reviewed
Copy the code into your page where the formula card should appear. It loads from lovetocalc.com, so it stays current on its own — all we ask is that the credit line comes with it.